Authors:
Jingjiao Wang, Meihong Wang, and Jianhui Zhao (View all authors)
Abstract
We aimed to explore the application effects of humanistic nursing combined with Neuman’s nursing in oncology patients.
One hundred oncology patients were randomly divided into the observation and control groups, with 50 patients in each. Comparisons were made between both groups in terms of SF-36 scores, treatment compliance, nursing quality scores, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores.
The observation group showed higher scores in the physical domain, physiological function, material life, and overall health of the SF-36 scale (P < 0.05). The observation group also exhibited higher treatment compliance rate (X² = 9.470), and higher scores in nurse-patient communication, nursing system, nursing service, and nursing environment of the nursing quality assessment (P < 0.05). After nursing, the observation group performed lower SAS and SDS scores (t = 17.556, 10.004), and higher scores in sleep quality, sleep duration, sleep disturbance, sleep onset latency, sleep efficiency, hypnotic medication use, and daytime dysfunction based on the PSQI (P < 0.05).
The combination of humanistic nursing and Neuman’s nursing improves the quality of life and treatment compliance in oncology patients, with improvements in negative emotions and sleep quality. However, this study’s small sample of 100 cancer patients may not fully represent the diverse characteristics of various cancer types and stages, limiting conclusion generalizability. Furthermore, the short duration may have missed later-stage nursing intervention impacts. Thus, large-scale, long-term research is needed to provide reliable clinical evidence.